UFC 258 Live: Kamaru Usman vs. Gilbert Burns Live Stream Free Online TV Coverage 2021

Watch UFC 258 Live Stream Kamaru Usman vs Gilbert Burns Full Fight Free Without Cable and Tv Online Free. UFC 258 full episodes of MMA Fighting Live and get the latest breaking news, exclusive videos and pictures, episode recaps and much more. The UFC 258 is the mixed martial arts event and the main fight in that card is fight between Kamaru Usman vs. Gilbert Burns. This fight is take place on the 13th February, 2021 and the venue for that fight is UFC APEX which is located on Las Vegas. It is now confirmed that this fight is to take place at that venue and what is not yet known is whether fans would be allowed to watch that event inside the stadium because of the Covid 19 pandemic which is currently ravaging many parts of the world.UFC welterweights, Chris Weidman and Uriah Hall have been reportedly booked to face off at UFC 258. In a rematch from 2010, almost 10 years later, the pair will step into the octagon together yet again. Both fighters at 36, Weidman is coming off a win against Omari Akhmedov while

Hall recently beat the legend, Anderson Silva, in October .Sean O’Malley says he is planning to return the Octagon at UFC 258 on 13th February, 2021.

[🔴]👉 Watch UFC 258 Live Stream - Click Here

[🔴]👉 Watch UFC 258 Live Stream - Click Here

Ultimate Fighting Championship 258 Info

Event Name         Ultimate Fighting Championship 258 Usman vs. Burns

Start Date         13th February 2021

Time         06:00 PM ET

Venue/City         UFC APEX, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Broadcaster         ESPN+PPV

Online Streaming Watch Now (HD/SD)

Click Here to Buy Express VPN to Watch UFC 258 Live Stream for Free without any Restrictions.

UFC 258 fight card

Kamaru Usman vs. Gilbert Burns

Maycee Barber vs. Alexa Grasso

Chris Weidman vs. Uriah Hall

Kelvin Gastelum vs. Ian Heinisch

Polyana Viana vs. Mallory Martin

Gabe Green vs. Philip Rowe

Julian Marquez vs. Maki Pitolo

Rodolfo Vieira vs. Anthony Hernandez

Pedro Munhoz vs. Jimmie Rivera

 

When is the UFC 258?

UFC 258 takes place Saturday 02.13.2021 at 06:00 PM ET.

Where will Take Place UFC 258?

The UFC 258 is one of the best exciting UFC events ever. UFC 258 takes place on February 13 , 2021, at UFC APEX , Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

What channel is UFC 258 on in the UK?

UFC 258 is expected to be shown live on BT Sport 1. There are multiple ways to get BT Sport. If you already have BT Broadband, you can add BT TV and Sport to your existing contract from just £15.00 per month. You can add the ‘Big Sport’ package for £40 per month which includes all BT Sport and 11 Sky Sports channels via a NOW TV pass.

Watch UFC 258 Livestream Online

You can watch UFC 258 with a BT Sport monthly pass without signing up to a contract. Regular subscribers can also stream matches via the BT Sport website or BT Sport app on a variety of devices including laptops, smartphones and tablets.

How to watch UFC 258 Live in US

US fans can watch the event live in the US via ESPN+.

On its own, EPSN+ costs $4.99 per month or $49.99 per year. It is expected that you will be able to purchase UFC 258 only for $64.99 or combine it with a ESPN+ annual subscription for $84.99, an over 25% saving.

Looking for more? We have our UFC schedule 2020 to bring you up to date.

Las Vegas UFC 258 Live Online (Streaming Providers)

Enough for the dedicated UFC 258 broadcasters. If you weren’t living under the rock, you must know that there are streaming services that provide live streaming for thousands of national and international TV channels. You can use services like Hulu, Sling, or DirecTV to watch your favorite channels online. Here are my most favorites:

DirecTV Now

DirectTV Now is a very popular streaming service. It provides more than 65 TV Channels which you can watch LIVE! It costs $40 per month. The good thing is, you can get a free trial of 7 days.

You can signup for an account there and enjoy most of the Events during the NFR weeks. That means free streaming! But if you feel generous and also want to enjoy the full 10 day-long events, you can start paying and enjoy your favorite tv channels online. You can always cancel your subscription before the trial ends and you won’t be charged.

Sling TV

Sling TV is a great alternative for a cable subscription, but it does not cover CBS or any other local broadcast station such. That means you cannot use their service to watch the NFR Online. Not recommended.

Hulu TV

Hulu is the cheapest premium TV Service provider. They offer a great selection of TV selection for a very low price, which is $5.99/month. You can use your same subscription to watch on 2 devices simultaneously.

They don’t offer any free trial at this moment, but for this price range, there is nothing to lose. There is no Live coverage of National Finals Rodeo on Hulu, you can watch after it finishes the TV Broadcasting.

FuboTV

FuboTV is a sports event streaming service. But it doesn’t offer Rodeo Live Coverage. You can watch Soccer, Basketball, Rugby, Baseball and other popular sports. It offers a 7-day free trial. After the trial ends, you will have to pay $19.99 for the first month. Then $44.99 a month for the rest of your life.

YouTube TV

Youtube is the most known streaming service for user-generated content, everyone heard of youtube, and they are free. But they also offer some other premium services too. YouTube TV is one of them. You can watch many channels there for $50 (previously $40). Here is the channels list:

• ABC
• CBS
• FOX
• NBC
• ACCN
• AMC
• Adult Swim
• Animal Planet
• BBC
• BBC World News
• BTN
• Bravo
• CBS Sports
• CNBC
• CNBC World
• CNN
• Cartoon Network
• Cozi TV
• Discovery
• Disney
• E!
• ESPN
• ESPNEWS
• FOX Business
• FOX News Channel
• FS1
• FS2
• FX
• FXM
• FXX
• Food Network
• Fox Sports
• Freeform
• Golf Channel
• HGTV
• HLN
• IFC
• Investigation Discovery
• LAFC
• Local Now
• MLB Game of the week
• MLB Network
• MSNBC
• Motortrend
• MyNetworkTV
• NBA TV
• NBC Sports
• NBC Universo
• NBCSN
• NECN
• NESN
• NatGeo Wild
• National Geographic
• Newsy
• Olympics Channel
• Orlando City
• Oxygen
• POP
• SEC ESPN Network
• SNY
• Smithsonian Channel
• Sounders FC
• StartTV
• SundanceTV
• SyFy

You can watch UFC 258 there. They also offer a 7 days free trial. This means you can watch the majority of the events for free and cancel the subscription before the regular payment date.

Can I watch UFC 258 live stream online free?

There is no legal way to watch 258 live stream free. Bue some websites: crackstreams,  Buffstream, MMA Streams, VIPBox, stream2watch. They Can provide UFC 258 live stream from their website. But those sites are full of pop up ads. It will harmful for your device. So we recommended you to order UFC 258 PPV from ESPN+ or your local providers. And Start watching UFC 258 live stream without any hassle.

UFC 257!* Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 (LiveStream) Full Fight FREE On Air

UFC 257!* Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 (LiveStream) Full Fight FREE On Air. Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live Stream Online. UFC 257 Full Card TV Channel. It’s finally announced The Most wanted and exciting UFC 257 as the “Conor McGregor” is set to open the season on Saturday, January 23 with a Time. Against in-state foe “Dustin Poirier” at UFC Fight Island. Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates

[🔴]Watch UFC 257 Live Stream — Click Here

[🔴]Watch UFC 257 Live Stream — Click Here

How to watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live Online From Anywhere

Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card writing about his event

Live stream Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 online

You can watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card without signing up to a contract. Regular subscribers can also stream matches website or Sport app on a variety of devices including laptops, smartphones and tablets.

How to watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live Online From Anywhere

Live stream Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 online

You can watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card without signing up to a contract. Regular subscribers can also stream matches website or Sport app on a variety of devices including laptops, smartphones and tablets.

Livestreaming, what’s in it for us?

Technology has advanced significantly since the first internet livestream but we still turn to video for almost everything. Let’s take a brief look at why livestreaming has been held back so far, and what tech innovations will propel livestreaming to the forefront of internet culture. Right now livestreaming is limited to just a few applications for mass public use and the rest are targeted towards businesses. Livestreaming is to today what home computers were in the early 1980s. The world of livestreaming is waiting for a metaphorical VIC-20, a very popular product that will make live streaming as popular as video through iterations and competition.

Download files or search for hours for the right clip. Allegedly inspired by the site “Hot or Not”, YouTube originally began as a dating site (think 80s video dating), but without a large ingress of dating videos, they opted to accept any video submission. And as we all know, that fateful decision changed all of our lives forever. Because of YouTube, the world that YouTube was born in no longer exists. The ability to share videos on the scale permitted by YouTube has brought us closer to the “global village” than I’d wager anyone thought realistically possible. And now with technologies like Starlink, we are moving closer and closer to that eventuality. Although the shared video will never become a legacy technology, before long it will truly have to share the stage with its sibling, livestreaming. Although livestreaming is over 20 years old, it hasn’t gained the incredible worldwide adoption YouTube has. This is largely due to infrastructure issues such as latency, quality, and cost.

Latency is a priority when it comes to livestreams.

Latency is the time it takes for a video to be captured and point a, and viewed at point b. In livestreaming this is done through an encoder-decoder function. Video and audio are captured and turned into code, the code specifies which colours display, when, for how long, and how bright. The code is then sent to the destination, such as a streaming site, where it is decoded into colours and audio again and then displayed on a device like a cell phone. The delay between the image being captured, the code being generated, transmitted, decoded, and played is consistently decreasing. It is now possible to stream content reliably with less than 3 seconds of latency. Sub-second latency is also common and within the next 20 or so years we may witness the last cable broadcast (or perhaps cable will be relegated to the niche market of CB radios, landlines, and AM transmissions).

On average, the latency associated with a cable broadcast is about 6 seconds. This is mainly due to limitations on broadcasts coming from the FCC or another similar organization in the interests of censorship. In terms of real-life, however, a 6 second delay on a broadcast is not that big of a deal. In all honesty a few hours’ delay wouldn’t spell the doom of mankind. But for certain types of broadcasts such as election results or sporting events, latency must be kept at a minimum to maximize the viability of the broadcast.

Sensitive Content is Hard to Monitor

Advances in AI technologies like computer vision have changed the landscape of internet broadcasting. Before too long, algorithms will be better able to prevent sensitive and inappropriate content from being broadcast across the internet on livestreaming platforms. Due to the sheer volume of streams it is much harder to monitor and contain internet broadcasts than it is cable, but we are very near a point where the ability to reliably detect and interrupt inappropriate broadcasts instantaneously. Currently, the majority of content is monitored by humans. And as we’ve learned over the last 50 or so years, computers and machines are much more reliable and consistent than humans could ever be. Everything is moving to an automated space and content moderation is not far behind. We simply don’t have the human resources to monitor every livestream, but with AI we won’t need it.

Video Quality

In the last decade we have seen video quality move from 720p to 1080p to 4K and beyond. I can personally remember a time when 480p was standard and 720p was considered a luxury reserved for only the most well funded YouTube videos. But times have changed and people expect video quality of at least 720p. Live streaming has always had issues meeting the demands of video quality. When watching streams on platforms like Twitch, the video can cut out, lag, drop in quality, and stutter all within about 45 seconds. Of course this isn’t as rampant now as it once was, however, sudden drops in quality will likely be a thorn in the side of live streams for years to come.

Internet Speeds

Perhaps the most common issue one needs to tackle when watching a live stream is their internet speed. Drops in video quality and connection are often due to the quality of the internet connection between the streamer and the viewer. Depending on the location of the parties involved, their distance from the server, and allocated connection speed the stream may experience some errors. And that’s just annoying. Here is a list of the recommended connection speeds for 3 of the most popular streaming applications:

Facebook Live recommends a max bit rate of 4,000 kbps, plus a max audio bit rate of 128 kbps.

YouTube Live recommends a range between 1,500 and 4,000 kbps for video, plus 128 kbps for audio.

Twitch recommends a range between 2,500 and 4,000 kbps for video, plus up to 160 kbps for audio.

Live streams are typically available for those of us with good internet. Every day more people are enjoying high quality speeds provided by fibre optic lines, but it will be a while until these lines can truly penetrate rural and less populated areas. Perhaps when that day comes we will see an upsurge of streaming coming from these areas.

Language Barrier

You can pause and rewind a video if you didn’t understand or hear something, and many video sharing platforms provide the option for subtitles. But you don’t really get that with a live stream. Pausing and rewinding an ongoing stream defeats the purpose of watching a stream. However, the day is soon approaching where we will be able to watch streams, in our own native language with subtitles, even if the streamer speaks something else. Microsoft Azure’s Cognitive Speech Services can give livestreaming platforms an edge in the future as it allows for speech to be automatically translated from language to language. The ability to watch a livestream in real time, with the added benefit of accurate subtitles in one’s own language, will also assist language learners in deciphering spontaneous speech.

Monetization

One of the most damning features of a live stream is the inherent difficulty in monetizing it. As mentioned before, videos can be paused and ads inserted. In videos, sponsored segments can be bought where the creators of the video read lines provided to them. Ads can run before videos etc. But in the case of a spontaneous live stream sponsored content will stick out. In the case of platforms like YouTube there are ways around ads. Ad blockers, the skip ad button, the deplorable premium account, and fast forwarding through sponsored segments all work together to limit the insane amount of ads we see every day. But in the case of a live stream, ads are a bit more difficult.

Live streaming platforms could implement sponsored overlays and borders or a similar graphical method of advertising, but the inclusion of screen shrinking add-ons like that may cause issues on smaller devices where screen size is already limited.

Monthly subscriptions are already the norm, but in the case of a live streaming platform (Twitch Prime not withstanding), it may be difficult for consumers to see the benefit in paying for a service that is by nature unscheduled and unpredictable. Live streams are great for quick entertainment, but as they can go on for hours at a time, re-watching streamed content is inherently time consuming. For this reason, many streamers cut their recorded streams down and upload them to platforms like YouTube where they are monetized through a partnership program. It is likely that for other streaming platforms to really take off, they would need to partner with a larger company and offer services similar to Amazon and Twitch.

What Might the Future of Livestreaming Look Like?

It is difficult to say, as it is with any speculation about the future. Technologies change and advance beyond the scope of our imaginations virtually every decade. But one thing that is almost a certainty is the continued advancement in our communications infrastructure. Fibre optic lines are being run to smaller towns and cities. Services like Google Fiber, which is now only available at 1 gigabit per second, have shown the current capabilities of our internet infrastructure. As services like this expand we can expect to see a large increase in the number of users seeking streams as the service they expect to interact with will be more stable than it currently is now. Livestreaming, at the moment, is used frequently by gamers and Esports and hasn’t yet seen the mass commercial expansion that is coming.

The future of live streaming is on its way. For clues for how it may be in North America we can look to Asia (taobao). Currently, livestreaming is quite popular in the East in terms of a phenomenon that hasn’t quite taken hold on us Westerners, Live Commerce. With retail stores closing left and right, we can’t expect Amazon to pick up all of the slack (as much as I’m sure they would like to). Live streaming affords entrepreneurs and retailers a new opportunity for sales and growth.

Live streaming isn’t the way of the future, video will never die, but the two will co-exist and be used for different purposes, as they are now. Live streaming can bring serious benefits to education as well by offering classrooms guest lessons and tutorials by leading professionals. Live streaming is more beneficial for education than video as it allows students to interact with guest teachers in real-time.

The live streaming market is waiting to be tapped. …

UFC 257: Conor vs Dustin 2 Live Stream Reddit

Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live Stream Online. UFC 257 Full Card TV Channel. It’s finally announced The Most wanted and exciting UFC 257 as the “Conor McGregor” is set to open the season on Saturday, January 23 with a Time. Against in-state foe “Dustin Poirier” at UFC Fight Island. Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates

Watch UFC 257 Live Stream — Click Here

Watch UFC 257 Live Stream — Click Here

How to watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live Online From Anywhere

Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card writing about his event

Live stream Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 online

You can watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card without signing up to a contract. Regular subscribers can also stream matches website or Sport app on a variety of devices including laptops, smartphones and tablets.

How to watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live Online From Anywhere

Live stream Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 online

You can watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card without signing up to a contract. Regular subscribers can also stream matches website or Sport app on a variety of devices including laptops, smartphones and tablets.

Livestreaming, what’s in it for us?

Technology has advanced significantly since the first internet livestream but we still turn to video for almost everything. Let’s take a brief look at why livestreaming has been held back so far, and what tech innovations will propel livestreaming to the forefront of internet culture. Right now livestreaming is limited to just a few applications for mass public use and the rest are targeted towards businesses. Livestreaming is to today what home computers were in the early 1980s. The world of livestreaming is waiting for a metaphorical VIC-20, a very popular product that will make live streaming as popular as video through iterations and competition.

Download files or search for hours for the right clip. Allegedly inspired by the site “Hot or Not”, YouTube originally began as a dating site (think 80s video dating), but without a large ingress of dating videos, they opted to accept any video submission. And as we all know, that fateful decision changed all of our lives forever. Because of YouTube, the world that YouTube was born in no longer exists. The ability to share videos on the scale permitted by YouTube has brought us closer to the “global village” than I’d wager anyone thought realistically possible. And now with technologies like Starlink, we are moving closer and closer to that eventuality. Although the shared video will never become a legacy technology, before long it will truly have to share the stage with its sibling, livestreaming. Although livestreaming is over 20 years old, it hasn’t gained the incredible worldwide adoption YouTube has. This is largely due to infrastructure issues such as latency, quality, and cost.

Latency is a priority when it comes to livestreams.

Latency is the time it takes for a video to be captured and point a, and viewed at point b. In livestreaming this is done through an encoder-decoder function. Video and audio are captured and turned into code, the code specifies which colours display, when, for how long, and how bright. The code is then sent to the destination, such as a streaming site, where it is decoded into colours and audio again and then displayed on a device like a cell phone. The delay between the image being captured, the code being generated, transmitted, decoded, and played is consistently decreasing. It is now possible to stream content reliably with less than 3 seconds of latency. Sub-second latency is also common and within the next 20 or so years we may witness the last cable broadcast (or perhaps cable will be relegated to the niche market of CB radios, landlines, and AM transmissions).

On average, the latency associated with a cable broadcast is about 6 seconds. This is mainly due to limitations on broadcasts coming from the FCC or another similar organization in the interests of censorship. In terms of real-life, however, a 6 second delay on a broadcast is not that big of a deal. In all honesty a few hours’ delay wouldn’t spell the doom of mankind. But for certain types of broadcasts such as election results or sporting events, latency must be kept at a minimum to maximize the viability of the broadcast.

Sensitive Content is Hard to Monitor

Advances in AI technologies like computer vision have changed the landscape of internet broadcasting. Before too long, algorithms will be better able to prevent sensitive and inappropriate content from being broadcast across the internet on livestreaming platforms. Due to the sheer volume of streams it is much harder to monitor and contain internet broadcasts than it is cable, but we are very near a point where the ability to reliably detect and interrupt inappropriate broadcasts instantaneously. Currently, the majority of content is monitored by humans. And as we’ve learned over the last 50 or so years, computers and machines are much more reliable and consistent than humans could ever be. Everything is moving to an automated space and content moderation is not far behind. We simply don’t have the human resources to monitor every livestream, but with AI we won’t need it.

Video Quality

In the last decade we have seen video quality move from 720p to 1080p to 4K and beyond. I can personally remember a time when 480p was standard and 720p was considered a luxury reserved for only the most well funded YouTube videos. But times have changed and people expect video quality of at least 720p. Live streaming has always had issues meeting the demands of video quality. When watching streams on platforms like Twitch, the video can cut out, lag, drop in quality, and stutter all within about 45 seconds. Of course this isn’t as rampant now as it once was, however, sudden drops in quality will likely be a thorn in the side of live streams for years to come.

Internet Speeds

Perhaps the most common issue one needs to tackle when watching a live stream is their internet speed. Drops in video quality and connection are often due to the quality of the internet connection between the streamer and the viewer. Depending on the location of the parties involved, their distance from the server, and allocated connection speed the stream may experience some errors. And that’s just annoying. Here is a list of the recommended connection speeds for 3 of the most popular streaming applications:

Facebook Live recommends a max bit rate of 4,000 kbps, plus a max audio bit rate of 128 kbps.

YouTube Live recommends a range between 1,500 and 4,000 kbps for video, plus 128 kbps for audio.

Twitch recommends a range between 2,500 and 4,000 kbps for video, plus up to 160 kbps for audio.

Live streams are typically available for those of us with good internet. Every day more people are enjoying high quality speeds provided by fibre optic lines, but it will be a while until these lines can truly penetrate rural and less populated areas. Perhaps when that day comes we will see an upsurge of streaming coming from these areas.

Language Barrier

You can pause and rewind a video if you didn’t understand or hear something, and many video sharing platforms provide the option for subtitles. But you don’t really get that with a live stream. Pausing and rewinding an ongoing stream defeats the purpose of watching a stream. However, the day is soon approaching where we will be able to watch streams, in our own native language with subtitles, even if the streamer speaks something else. Microsoft Azure’s Cognitive Speech Services can give livestreaming platforms an edge in the future as it allows for speech to be automatically translated from language to language. The ability to watch a livestream in real time, with the added benefit of accurate subtitles in one’s own language, will also assist language learners in deciphering spontaneous speech.

Monetization

One of the most damning features of a live stream is the inherent difficulty in monetizing it. As mentioned before, videos can be paused and ads inserted. In videos, sponsored segments can be bought where the creators of the video read lines provided to them. Ads can run before videos etc. But in the case of a spontaneous live stream sponsored content will stick out. In the case of platforms like YouTube there are ways around ads. Ad blockers, the skip ad button, the deplorable premium account, and fast forwarding through sponsored segments all work together to limit the insane amount of ads we see every day. But in the case of a live stream, ads are a bit more difficult.

Live streaming platforms could implement sponsored overlays and borders or a similar graphical method of advertising, but the inclusion of screen shrinking add-ons like that may cause issues on smaller devices where screen size is already limited.

Monthly subscriptions are already the norm, but in the case of a live streaming platform (Twitch Prime not withstanding), it may be difficult for consumers to see the benefit in paying for a service that is by nature unscheduled and unpredictable. Live streams are great for quick entertainment, but as they can go on for hours at a time, re-watching streamed content is inherently time consuming. For this reason, many streamers cut their recorded streams down and upload them to platforms like YouTube where they are monetized through a partnership program. It is likely that for other streaming platforms to really take off, they would need to partner with a larger company and offer services similar to Amazon and Twitch.

What Might the Future of Livestreaming Look Like?

It is difficult to say, as it is with any speculation about the future. Technologies change and advance beyond the scope of our imaginations virtually every decade. But one thing that is almost a certainty is the continued advancement in our communications infrastructure. Fibre optic lines are being run to smaller towns and cities. Services like Google Fiber, which is now only available at 1 gigabit per second, have shown the current capabilities of our internet infrastructure. As services like this expand we can expect to see a large increase in the number of users seeking streams as the service they expect to interact with will be more stable than it currently is now. Livestreaming, at the moment, is used frequently by gamers and Esports and hasn’t yet seen the mass commercial expansion that is coming.

The future of live streaming is on its way. For clues for how it may be in North America we can look to Asia (taobao). Currently, livestreaming is quite popular in the East in terms of a phenomenon that hasn’t quite taken hold on us Westerners, Live Commerce. With retail stores closing left and right, we can’t expect Amazon to pick up all of the slack (as much as I’m sure they would like to). Live streaming affords entrepreneurs and retailers a new opportunity for sales and growth.

Live streaming isn’t the way of the future, video will never die, but the two will co-exist and be used for different purposes, as they are now. Live streaming can bring serious benefits to education as well by offering classrooms guest lessons and tutorials by leading professionals. Live streaming is more beneficial for education than video as it allows students to interact with guest teachers in real-time.

The live streaming market is waiting to be tapped. …

++LIVE|🔴!! Holloway vs. Kattar Live Stream (UFC Fight Night Game) — Broadcast

• +LIVE|🔴!! Holloway vs. Kattar Live Stream (UFC Fight Night Game) — Broadcast

Go Live: [[ https://t.co/xKAKfKHhtH ]]

Event details:
— — — — — — —

Fight: UFC Fight Night

Date: January 16, 2021

Venue: Etihad Arena on Yas Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

UFC on ABC: Holloway vs. Kattar is an upcoming mixed martial arts event produced by the Ultimate Fighting Championship that will take place on January 16, 2021 at the Etihad Arena on Yas Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

UFC Fight Night Quick Card

Max Holloway  vs.  Calvin Kattar                     145 lbs

Carlos Condit  vs.  Matt Brown                        170 lbs

S. Ponzinibbio  vs.  Jingliang Li                        170 lbs

Joaquin Buckley  vs.  A. Di Chirico                  185 lbs

Punahele Soriano  vs.  Duško Todorović        185 lbs

N. Imavov  vs.  Phil Hawes                                185 lbs

Yanan Wu  vs.  Joselyne Edwards                    125 lbs

Omari Akhmedov  vs.  Tom Breese                  185 lbs

Justin Tafa  vs.  Carlos Felipe                            265 lbs

David Zawada  vs.  Ramazan Emeev               170 lbs

Sarah Moras  vs.  Vanessa Melo                       135 lbs

Jacob Kilburn  vs.  Austin Lingo                      145 lbs

[LIVE] — LFA 95: Browne vs. Estrazulas | Live Stream — 2020

LFA starts stage 4 this month and finishes in December as LFA balances its 2020 schedule year with two additional occasions in the Sunflower State.

Watch UFC 257 Live Stream — Click Here

LFA 95: Browne vs. Estrázulas Fight Details

7 Days Trial Free Watch Live Now

Main Event: Browne vs Estrázulas

Date: Friday, November 20, 2020

Time: 8:00pm ET

Venue: Hartman Arena, Park City, Kansas, United States

Online Streaming: FuboTV (try for Nothing)

Facebook Live, LinkedIn Live, YouTube Live, Periscope, Instagram Live Over the past several years, major social media platforms democratized and commodified live streaming, with YouTube Live launching way back in 2011, and Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and others (R.I.P. Meerkat) following suit. Most recently, LinkedIn launched live streaming on its platform, too, so businesses and professionals can reach their network in new and engaging ways.

These free platforms are great for brands and businesses looking to dip a toe in the live streaming pond, but they are not viable solutions for long-term scale and growth of a video strategy. Why? While ease of use is a major draw, for sure, none offer onboarding or customer support. If your team hits a snag with an event, you’re left to your own devices to problem-solve in real-time.

What’s more, streaming is only possible on a platform-by-platform basis. This means if you want to stream to Facebook and Twitter at the same time, you’ll need two cameras to live stream from each device — creating twice as much work (or more) and a less-than-ideal experience for the on-screen talent and viewers alike. ANOTHER POST.

Nobody is ever thrilled to pay nearly $11K for a golfer they probably hadn’t heard of until a handful of weeks ago, but both Zalatoris, along with Sam Burns will be at the top of my list this week on DraftKings.

Zalatoris gets the slight edge with his outstanding play in nearly every metric that’s not near the green. He ranks first amongst players in the field in SG: total and fourth in SG: approach. We also joke about getting the putter hot for a weekend, and if Zalatoris can improve on his SG: putting which ranks 129th in the field, he should absolutely contend yet again. Other Games.

He’s finished no worse than T19 in his last five events, including three top six finishes. His T6 result at Winged Foot opened up plenty of eyeballs, so he’ll be a popular play, which makes him all the more worthwhile in cash at the top.

While I was impressed with the way Will Zalatoris played last week at the U.S. Open, I’m more inclined this week to go with the more experienced Tour pro. Will will (that’s funny “Will will”) be a fixture on the PGA Tour — if not this year than next. He is one of the top players on the Korn Ferry Tour now. However, Corey Connors made the Playoffs and has been playing well last season (this is so weird calling it last season already). I’ll have both in a lineup this week, but my gut has me leaning with the Canadian. MORE POST.

[LiVeSTrEaM||Official@] “Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live” Stream free UFC 257 Reddit

Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live Stream Fight Online. UFC 257 Full Card TV Channel. It’s finally announced The Most wanted and exciting UFC 257 as the “Conor McGregor” is set to open the season on Saturday, January 23 with a Time. Against in-state foe “Dustin Poirier” at UFC Fight Island. Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates

Watch UFC 257 Live Stream — Click Here

How to watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live Online From Anywhere

Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card writing about his event

Live stream Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 online

You can watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card without signing up to a contract. Regular subscribers can also stream matches website or Sport app on a variety of devices including laptops, smartphones and tablets.

How to watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 Live Online From Anywhere

You can watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card without signing up to a contract. Regular subscribers can also stream matches website or Sport app on a variety of devices including laptops, smartphones and tablets.

Live stream Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 online

You can watch Conor McGregor vs Dustin Poirier 2 UFC 257 Full Card without signing up to a contract. Regular subscribers can also stream matches website or Sport app on a variety of devices including laptops, smartphones and tablets.

Livestreaming, what’s in it for us?

Technology has advanced significantly since the first internet livestream but we still turn to video for almost everything. Let’s take a brief look at why livestreaming has been held back so far, and what tech innovations will propel livestreaming to the forefront of internet culture. Right now livestreaming is limited to just a few applications for mass public use and the rest are targeted towards businesses. Livestreaming is to today what home computers were in the early 1980s. The world of livestreaming is waiting for a metaphorical VIC-20, a very popular product that will make live streaming as popular as video through iterations and competition.

download files or search for hours for the right clip. Allegedly inspired by the site “Hot or Not”, YouTube originally began as a dating site (think 80s video dating), but without a large ingress of dating videos, they opted to accept any video submission. And as we all know, that fateful decision changed all of our lives forever. Because of YouTube, the world that YouTube was born in no longer exists. The ability to share videos on the scale permitted by YouTube has brought us closer to the “global village” than I’d wager anyone thought realistically possible. And now with technologies like Starlink, we are moving closer and closer to that eventuality. Although the shared video will never become a legacy technology, before long it will truly have to share the stage with its sibling, livestreaming. Although livestreaming is over 20 years old, it hasn’t gained the incredible worldwide adoption YouTube has. This is largely due to infrastructure issues such as latency, quality, and cost.

Latency is a priority when it comes to livestreams.

Latency is the time it takes for a video to be captured and point a, and viewed at point b. In livestreaming this is done through an encoder-decoder function. Video and audio are captured and turned into code, the code specifies which colours display, when, for how long, and how bright. The code is then sent to the destination, such as a streaming site, where it is decoded into colours and audio again and then displayed on a device like a cell phone. The delay between the image being captured, the code being generated, transmitted, decoded, and played is consistently decreasing. It is now possible to stream content reliably with less than 3 seconds of latency. Sub-second latency is also common and within the next 20 or so years we may witness the last cable broadcast (or perhaps cable will be relegated to the niche market of CB radios, landlines, and AM transmissions).

On average, the latency associated with a cable broadcast is about 6 seconds. This is mainly due to limitations on broadcasts coming from the FCC or another similar organization in the interests of censorship. In terms of real-life, however, a 6 second delay on a broadcast is not that big of a deal. In all honesty a few hours’ delay wouldn’t spell the doom of mankind. But for certain types of broadcasts such as election results or sporting events, latency must be kept at a minimum to maximize the viability of the broadcast.

Sensitive Content is Hard to Monitor

Advances in AI technologies like computer vision have changed the landscape of internet broadcasting. Before too long, algorithms will be better able to prevent sensitive and inappropriate content from being broadcast across the internet on livestreaming platforms. Due to the sheer volume of streams it is much harder to monitor and contain internet broadcasts than it is cable, but we are very near a point where the ability to reliably detect and interrupt inappropriate broadcasts instantaneously. Currently, the majority of content is monitored by humans. And as we’ve learned over the last 50 or so years, computers and machines are much more reliable and consistent than humans could ever be. Everything is moving to an automated space and content moderation is not far behind. We simply don’t have the human resources to monitor every livestream, but with AI we won’t need it.

Video Quality

In the last decade we have seen video quality move from 720p to 1080p to 4K and beyond. I can personally remember a time when 480p was standard and 720p was considered a luxury reserved for only the most well funded YouTube videos. But times have changed and people expect video quality of at least 720p. Live streaming has always had issues meeting the demands of video quality. When watching streams on platforms like Twitch, the video can cut out, lag, drop in quality, and stutter all within about 45 seconds. Of course this isn’t as rampant now as it once was, however, sudden drops in quality will likely be a thorn in the side of live streams for years to come.

Internet Speeds

Perhaps the most common issue one needs to tackle when watching a live stream is their internet speed. Drops in video quality and connection are often due to the quality of the internet connection between the streamer and the viewer. Depending on the location of the parties involved, their distance from the server, and allocated connection speed the stream may experience some errors. And that’s just annoying. Here is a list of the recommended connection speeds for 3 of the most popular streaming applications:

Facebook Live recommends a max bit rate of 4,000 kbps, plus a max audio bit rate of 128 kbps.

YouTube Live recommends a range between 1,500 and 4,000 kbps for video, plus 128 kbps for audio.

Twitch recommends a range between 2,500 and 4,000 kbps for video, plus up to 160 kbps for audio.

Live streams are typically available for those of us with good internet. Every day more people are enjoying high quality speeds provided by fibre optic lines, but it will be a while until these lines can truly penetrate rural and less populated areas. Perhaps when that day comes we will see an upsurge of streaming coming from these areas.

Language Barrier

You can pause and rewind a video if you didn’t understand or hear something, and many video sharing platforms provide the option for subtitles. But you don’t really get that with a live stream. Pausing and rewinding an ongoing stream defeats the purpose of watching a stream. However, the day is soon approaching where we will be able to watch streams, in our own native language with subtitles, even if the streamer speaks something else. Microsoft Azure’s Cognitive Speech Services can give livestreaming platforms an edge in the future as it allows for speech to be automatically translated from language to language. The ability to watch a livestream in real time, with the added benefit of accurate subtitles in one’s own language, will also assist language learners in deciphering spontaneous speech.

Monetization

One of the most damning features of a live stream is the inherent difficulty in monetizing it. As mentioned before, videos can be paused and ads inserted. In videos, sponsored segments can be bought where the creators of the video read lines provided to them. Ads can run before videos etc. But in the case of a spontaneous live stream sponsored content will stick out. In the case of platforms like YouTube there are ways around ads. Ad blockers, the skip ad button, the deplorable premium account, and fast forwarding through sponsored segments all work together to limit the insane amount of ads we see every day. But in the case of a live stream, ads are a bit more difficult.

Live streaming platforms could implement sponsored overlays and borders or a similar graphical method of advertising, but the inclusion of screen shrinking add-ons like that may cause issues on smaller devices where screen size is already limited.

Monthly subscriptions are already the norm, but in the case of a live streaming platform (Twitch Prime not withstanding), it may be difficult for consumers to see the benefit in paying for a service that is by nature unscheduled and unpredictable. Live streams are great for quick entertainment, but as they can go on for hours at a time, re-watching streamed content is inherently time consuming. For this reason, many streamers cut their recorded streams down and upload them to platforms like YouTube where they are monetized through a partnership program. It is likely that for other streaming platforms to really take off, they would need to partner with a larger company and offer services similar to Amazon and Twitch.

What Might the Future of Livestreaming Look Like?

It is difficult to say, as it is with any speculation about the future. Technologies change and advance beyond the scope of our imaginations virtually every decade. But one thing that is almost a certainty is the continued advancement in our communications infrastructure. Fibre optic lines are being run to smaller towns and cities. Services like Google Fiber, which is now only available at 1 gigabit per second, have shown the current capabilities of our internet infrastructure. As services like this expand we can expect to see a large increase in the number of users seeking streams as the service they expect to interact with will be more stable than it currently is now. Livestreaming, at the moment, is used frequently by gamers and Esports and hasn’t yet seen the mass commercial expansion that is coming.

The future of live streaming is on its way. For clues for how it may be in North America we can look to Asia (taobao). Currently, livestreaming is quite popular in the East in terms of a phenomenon that hasn’t quite taken hold on us Westerners, Live Commerce. With retail stores closing left and right, we can’t expect Amazon to pick up all of the slack (as much as I’m sure they would like to). Live streaming affords entrepreneurs and retailers a new opportunity for sales and growth.

Live streaming isn’t the way of the future, video will never die, but the two will co-exist and be used for different purposes, as they are now. Live streaming can bring serious benefits to education as well by offering classrooms guest lessons and tutorials by leading professionals. Live streaming is more beneficial for education than video as it allows students to interact with guest teachers in real-time.

The live streaming market is waiting to be tapped. …